Glossary term
Misuse of Legal Persons and Arrangements
Subject: Financial Crime, Money Laundering, Typologies and Asset Recovery
Misuse of legal persons and arrangements is the use of companies, partnerships, trusts and foundations to hide who owns or controls assets, so that crime proceeds, tax evasion or sanctioned activity can be concealed.
Explanation
Legal persons are entities that can own property and sign contracts, such as companies. Legal arrangements, such as trusts, hold assets for others without being a separate person. Criminals use them because forming one is fast and cheap in many places, and because names on a register need not be the real owners. Common techniques include shell companies with no activity, nominee directors and shareholders who front for the real owner, bearer shares, layered ownership across several countries, and trusts that separate the owner from the assets. Trust and company service providers and company formation agents can unwittingly or knowingly assist. Defences include beneficial ownership registers, rules on nominee disclosure, due diligence by banks and professionals, and checks by company registries. Without a register that names the real owner, a bank can only guess who stands behind a customer, which is why ownership transparency is a core control in anti-money laundering standards.
Example
An insurer's underwriting team finds that a corporate policyholder is owned by a holding firm in one country, which is held by a trust in another, with a nominee director signing every document. Premiums arrive from unrelated companies and are refunded within days after cancellation. The insurer cannot identify the true owner, ends the relationship and reports its concerns.
Not to be confused with
- Beneficial Ownership Transparency
- Transparency is the set of measures that reveal real owners. Misuse describes what criminals do when those measures are missing or weak.